Sander Greenland
University of California, Los Angeles
H-index: 152
North America-United States
Description
Sander Greenland, With an exceptional h-index of 152 and a recent h-index of 81 (since 2020), a distinguished researcher at University of California, Los Angeles, specializes in the field of Epidemiology and Statistics.
His recent articles reflect a diverse array of research interests and contributions to the field:
Comparative Analysis of Instrumental Variables on the Assignment of Buprenorphine/Naloxone or Methadone for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder
Process guide for inferential studies using healthcare data from routine clinical practice to evaluate causal effects of drugs (PRINCIPLED): considerations from the FDA …
Why Stating Hypotheses in Grant Applications Is Unnecessary
Forcing a Deterministic Frame on Probabilistic Phenomena: A Communication Blind Spot in Media Coverage of the “Replication Crisis”
What is the ideal time to begin tapering opioid agonist treatment? A protocol for a retrospective population-based comparative effectiveness study in British Columbia, Canada
Divergence versus decision P‐values: A distinction worth making in theory and keeping in practice: Or, how divergence P‐values measure evidence even when decision P‐values do not
Understanding and reporting odds ratios as rate-ratio estimates in case-control studies
A New Look at P Values for Randomized Clinical Trials
Professor Information
University | University of California, Los Angeles |
---|---|
Position | Emeritus Professor of Epidemiology & Statistics |
Citations(all) | 132007 |
Citations(since 2020) | 41958 |
Cited By | 120033 |
hIndex(all) | 152 |
hIndex(since 2020) | 81 |
i10Index(all) | 473 |
i10Index(since 2020) | 288 |
University Profile Page | University of California, Los Angeles |
Research & Interests List
Epidemiology and Statistics
Top articles of Sander Greenland
Comparative Analysis of Instrumental Variables on the Assignment of Buprenorphine/Naloxone or Methadone for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder
MethodsComparative Analysis of Instrumental Variables on the Assignment of Buprenorphine/Naloxone or Methadone for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder
Authors
Fahmida Homayra,Benjamin Enns,Jeong Eun Min,Megan Kurz,Paxton Bach,Julie Bruneau,Sander Greenland,Paul Gustafson,Mohammad Ehsanul Karim,P Todd Korthuis,Thomas Loughin,Malcolm MacLure,Lawrence McCandless,Robert William Platt,Kevin Schnepel,Hitoshi Shigeoka,Uwe Siebert,Eugenia Socias,Evan Wood,Bohdan Nosyk
Journal
Epidemiology
Published Date
2024/3/1
Process guide for inferential studies using healthcare data from routine clinical practice to evaluate causal effects of drugs (PRINCIPLED): considerations from the FDA …
This report proposes a stepwise process covering the range of considerations to systematically consider key choices for study design and data analysis for non-interventional studies with the central objective of fostering generation of reliable and reproducible evidence. These steps include (1) formulating a well defined causal question via specification of the target trial protocol; (2) describing the emulation of each component of the target trial protocol and identifying fit-for-purpose data; (3) assessing expected precision and conducting diagnostic evaluations; (4) developing a plan for robustness assessments including deterministic sensitivity analyses, quantitative bias analyses, and net bias evaluation; and (5) inferential analyses.
Authors
Rishi J Desai,Shirley V Wang,Sushama Kattinakere Sreedhara,Luke Zabotka,Farzin Khosrow-Khavar,Jennifer C Nelson,Xu Shi,Sengwee Toh,Richard Wyss,Elisabetta Patorno,Sarah Dutcher,Jie Li,Hana Lee,Robert Ball,Gerald Dal Pan,Jodi B Segal,Samy Suissa,Kenneth J Rothman,Sander Greenland,Miguel A Hernán,Patrick J Heagerty,Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal
bmj
Published Date
2024/2/12
Why Stating Hypotheses in Grant Applications Is Unnecessary
Methods Are Just Means to Test Hypotheses So We Shoud Know What the Applicants are Trying to Test
Authors
Miguel A Hernán,Sander Greenland
Journal
JAMA
Published Date
2024/1/23
Forcing a Deterministic Frame on Probabilistic Phenomena: A Communication Blind Spot in Media Coverage of the “Replication Crisis”
The current controversy surrounding research replication in biomedical and psychosocial sciences often overlooks the uncertainties surrounding both the original and replication studies. Overemphasizing single attempts as definitive replication successes or failures, as exemplified by media coverage of the landmark Reproducibility Project: Psychology, fosters misleading dichotomies and erodes public trust. To avoid such unintended consequences, science communicators should more clearly articulate statistical variation and other uncertainty sources in replication, while emphasizing the cumulative nature of science in general and replication in particular.
Authors
Carol Ting,Sander Greenland
Journal
Science Communication
Published Date
2024/4/5
What is the ideal time to begin tapering opioid agonist treatment? A protocol for a retrospective population-based comparative effectiveness study in British Columbia, Canada
IntroductionOpioid agonist treatment (OAT) tapering involves a gradual reduction in daily medication dose to ultimately reach a state of opioid abstinence. Due to the high risk of relapse and overdose after tapering, this practice is not recommended by clinical guidelines, however, clients may still request to taper off medication. The ideal time to initiate an OAT taper is not known. However, ethically, taper plans should acknowledge clients’ preferences and autonomy but apply principles of shared informed decision-making regarding safety and efficacy. Linked population-level data capturing real-world tapering practices provide a valuable opportunity to improve existing evidence on when to contemplate starting an OAT taper. Our objective is to determine the comparative effectiveness of alternative times from OAT initiation at which a taper can be initiated, with a primary outcome of taper completion, as observed in …
Authors
Ruyu Yan,Megan Kurz,B Carolina Guerra-Alejos,Jeong Eun Min,Paxton Bach,Sander Greenland,Paul Gustafson,Ehsan Karim,P Todd Korthuis,Tom Loughin,Lawrence McCandless,Robert W Platt,Kevin Schnepel,Shaun Seaman,M Eugenia Socías,Evan Wood,Hui Xie,Bohdan Nosyk
Journal
BMJ open
Published Date
2024/4/1
Divergence versus decision P‐values: A distinction worth making in theory and keeping in practice: Or, how divergence P‐values measure evidence even when decision P‐values do not
There are two distinct definitions of “P‐value” for evaluating a proposed hypothesis or model for the process generating an observed dataset. The original definition starts with a measure of the divergence of the dataset from what was expected under the model, such as a sum of squares or a deviance statistic. A P‐value is then the ordinal location of the measure in a reference distribution computed from the model and the data, and is treated as a unit‐scaled index of compatibility between the data and the model. In the other definition, a P‐value is a random variable on the unit interval whose realizations can be compared to a cutoff α to generate a decision rule with known error rates under the model and specific alternatives. It is commonly assumed that realizations of such decision P‐values always correspond to divergence P‐values. But this need not be so: Decision P‐values can violate intuitive single‐sample …
Authors
Sander Greenland
Journal
Scandinavian Journal of Statistics
Published Date
2023/3
Understanding and reporting odds ratios as rate-ratio estimates in case-control studies
BackgroundWe noted that there remains some confusion in the health-science literature on reporting sample odds ratios as estimated rate ratios in case-control studies.MethodsWe recap historical literature that definitively answered the question of when sample odds ratios (ORs) from a case-control study are consistent estimators for population rate ratios. We use numerical examples to illustrate the magnitude of the disparity between sample ORs in a case-control study and population rate ratios when sufficient conditions for them to be equal are not satisfied.ResultsWe stress that in a case-control study, sampling controls from those still at risk at the time of outcome event of the index case is not sufficient for a sample OR to be a consistent estimator for an intelligible rate ratio. In such studies, constancy of the exposure prevalence together with constancy of the hazard ratio (HR)(ie, the instantaneous rate ratio) over …
Authors
Steven Kerr,Sander Greenland,Karen Jeffrey,Tristan Millington,Stuart Bedston,Lewis Ritchie,Colin R Simpson,Adeniyi Francis Fagbamigbe,Amanj Kurdi,Chris Robertson,Aziz Sheikh,Igor Rudan
Journal
Journal of Global Health
Published Date
2023
A New Look at P Values for Randomized Clinical Trials
BackgroundWe have examined the primary efficacy results of 23,551 randomized clinical trials from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.MethodsWe estimate that the great majority of trials have much lower statistical power for actual effects than the 80 or 90% for the stated effect sizes. Consequently, “statistically significant” estimates tend to seriously overestimate actual treatment effects, “nonsignificant” results often correspond to important effects, and efforts to replicate often fail to achieve “significance” and may even appear to contradict initial results. To address these issues, we reinterpret the P value in terms of a reference population of studies that are, or could have been, in the Cochrane Database.ResultsThis leads to an empirical guide for the interpretation of an observed P value from a “typical” clinical trial in terms of the degree of overestimation of the reported effect, the probability of the effect’s …
Authors
Erik van Zwet,Andrew Gelman,Sander Greenland,Guido Imbens,Simon Schwab,Steven N Goodman
Journal
NEJM evidence
Published Date
2023/12/26
Professor FAQs
What is Sander Greenland's h-index at University of California, Los Angeles?
The h-index of Sander Greenland has been 81 since 2020 and 152 in total.
What are Sander Greenland's top articles?
The articles with the titles of
Comparative Analysis of Instrumental Variables on the Assignment of Buprenorphine/Naloxone or Methadone for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder
Process guide for inferential studies using healthcare data from routine clinical practice to evaluate causal effects of drugs (PRINCIPLED): considerations from the FDA …
Why Stating Hypotheses in Grant Applications Is Unnecessary
Forcing a Deterministic Frame on Probabilistic Phenomena: A Communication Blind Spot in Media Coverage of the “Replication Crisis”
What is the ideal time to begin tapering opioid agonist treatment? A protocol for a retrospective population-based comparative effectiveness study in British Columbia, Canada
Divergence versus decision P‐values: A distinction worth making in theory and keeping in practice: Or, how divergence P‐values measure evidence even when decision P‐values do not
Understanding and reporting odds ratios as rate-ratio estimates in case-control studies
A New Look at P Values for Randomized Clinical Trials
...
are the top articles of Sander Greenland at University of California, Los Angeles.
What are Sander Greenland's research interests?
The research interests of Sander Greenland are: Epidemiology and Statistics
What is Sander Greenland's total number of citations?
Sander Greenland has 132,007 citations in total.