companyurlfinder

Nicholas Eggert

Nicholas Eggert

Cornell University

H-index: 152

North America-United States

Description

Professor Information

University

Cornell University

Position

___

Citations(all)

124486

Citations(since 2020)

38707

Cited By

104612

hIndex(all)

152

hIndex(since 2020)

80

i10Index(all)

284

i10Index(since 2020)

228

Email

Access Email

University Profile Page

Cornell University

Top articles of Nicholas Eggert

Searches for long-lived charged particles in pp collisions at root s= 7 and 8 TeV (vol 07, 122, 2013)

CMS has uncovered an issue with the muon trigger simulation that impacts particles with| Q|= e/3. Consequently, we retract the cross section and mass limits, and related analysis details for| Q|= e/3 particles set in JHEP 07(2013) 122. The| Q|= 2e/3 results are not affected within the uncertainties. We are supplying in attachment revised plots for figure 10 and figure 11 plus a revised table 8 that have the| Q|= e/3 results removed.

Authors

S Chatrchyan,V Khachatryan,AM Sirunyan,A Tumasyan,W Adam,T Bergauer,M Dragicevic,J Eroe,C Fabjan,M Friedl,R Fruehwirth,VM Ghete,N Hoermann,J Hrubec,M Jeitler,W Kiesenhofer,V Knuenz,M Krammer,I Kraetschmer,D Liko,I Mikulec,D Rabady,B Rahbaran,C Rohringer,H Rohringer,R Schoefbeck,J Strauss,A Taurok,W Treberer-Treberspurg,W Waltenberger,C-E Wulz,N Shumeiko,S Alderweireldt,M Bansal,S Bansal,T Cornelis,EA De Wolf,X Janssen,A Knutsson,S Luyckx,L Mucibello,S Ochesanu,B Roland,R Rougny,H Van Haevermaet,P Van Mechelen,A Van Spilbeeck,F Blekman,S Blyweert,J D'Hondt,A Kalogeropoulos,J Keaveney,M Maes,A Olbrechts,S Tavernier,W Van Doninck,P Van Mulders,GP Van Onsem,I Villella,B Clerbaux,G De Lentdecker,L Favart,APR Gay,T Hreus,A Leonard,PE Marage,A Mohammadi,L Pernie,T Reis,T Seva,L Thomas,C Vander Velde,P Vanlaer,J Wang,V Adler,K Beernaert,L Benucci,A Cimmino,S Costantini,S Dildick,G Garcia,B Klein,J Lellouch,A Marinov,J Mccartin,AA Ocampo Rios,Dirk Ryckbosch,M Sigamani,Nadja Strobbe,F Thyssen,Michael Tytgat,S Walsh,E Yazgan,N Zaganidis,S Basegmez,C Beluffi,G Bruno,R Castello,A Caudron,L Ceard,C Delaere,T du Pree,D Favart,L Forthomme,A Giammanco,J Hollar,P Jez,V Lemaitre,J Liao,O Militaru,C Nuttens,D Pagano,A Pin,K Piotrzkowski,A Popov,M Selvaggi,N Beliy,T Caebergs,E Daubie,GH Hammad,GA Alves,M Correa Martins Junior,T Martins,ME Pol,MHG Souza,WL Alda Junior,W Carvalho,J Chinellato,A Custodio,EM Da Costa,D De Jesus Damiao,C De Oliveira Martins,S Fonseca De Souza,H Malbouisson,M Malek,D Matos Figueiredo,L Mundim,H Nogima,WL Prado Da Silva,A Santoro,A Sznajder,EJ Tonelli Manganote,A Vilela Pereira,CA Bernardes,FA Dias,TR Fernandez Perez Tomei,EM Gregores,C Lagana,F Marinho,PG Mercadante

Journal

Journal of High Energy Physics

Published Date

2022

Erratum to: Searches for long-lived charged particles in pp collisions at = 7 and 8 TeV

CMS has uncovered an issue with the muon trigger simulation that impacts particles with| Q|= e/3. Consequently, we retract the cross section and mass limits, and related analysis details for| Q|= e/3 particles set in JHEP 07(2013) 122. The| Q|= 2e/3 results are not affected within the uncertainties. We are supplying in attachment revised plots for figure 10 and figure 11 plus a revised table 8 that have the| Q|= e/3 results removed.

Authors

S Chatrchyan,V Khachatryan,AM Sirunyan,A Tumasyan,W Adam,T Bergauer,M Dragicevic,J Erö,C Fabjan,M Friedl,R Frühwirth,VM Ghete,N Hörmann,J Hrubec,M Jeitler,W Kiesenhofer,V Knünz,M Krammer,I Krätschmer,D Liko,I Mikulec,D Rabady,B Rahbaran,C Rohringer,H Rohringer,R Schöfbeck,J Strauss,A Taurok,W Treberer-Treberspurg,W Waltenberger,C-E Wulz,N Shumeiko,S Alderweireldt,M Bansal,S Bansal,T Cornelis,EA De Wolf,X Janssen,A Knutsson,S Luyckx,L Mucibello,S Ochesanu,B Roland,R Rougny,H Van Haevermaet,P Van Mechelen,A Van Spilbeeck,F Blekman,S Blyweert,J D’Hondt,A Kalogeropoulos,J Keaveney,M Maes,A Olbrechts,S Tavernier,W Van Doninck,P Van Mulders,GP Van Onsem,I Villella,B Clerbaux,G De Lentdecker,L Favart,APR Gay,T Hreus,A Léonard,PE Marage,A Mohammadi,L Perniè,T Reis,T Seva,L Thomas,C Vander Velde,P Vanlaer,J Wang,V Adler,K Beernaert,L Benucci,A Cimmino,S Costantini,S Dildick,G Garcia,B Klein,J Lellouch,A Marinov,J Mccartin,AA Ocampo Rios,D Ryckbosch,M Sigamani,N Strobbe,F Thyssen,M Tytgat,S Walsh,E Yazgan,N Zaganidis,S Basegmez,C Beluffi,G Bruno,R Castello,A Caudron,L Ceard,C Delaere,T du Pree,D Favart,L Forthomme,A Giammanco,J Hollar,P Jez,V Lemaitre,J Liao,O Militaru,C Nuttens,D Pagano,A Pin,K Piotrzkowski,A Popov,M Selvaggi,N Beliy,T Caebergs,E Daubie,GH Hammad,GA Alves,M Correa Martins Junior,T Martins,ME Pol,MHG Souza,WL Aldá Júnior,W Carvalho,J Chinellato,A Custódio,EM Da Costa,D De Jesus Damiao,C De Oliveira Martins,S Fonseca De Souza,H Malbouisson,M Malek,D Matos Figueiredo,L Mundim,H Nogima,WL Prado Da Silva,A Santoro,A Sznajder,EJ Tonelli Manganote,A Vilela Pereira,CA Bernardes,FA Dias,TR Fernandez Perez Tomei,EM Gregores,C Lagana,F Marinho,PG Mercadante

Journal

Journal of High Energy Physics

Published Date

2022/11

Search for top squark pair production in compressed-mass-spectrum scenarios in proton–proton collisions at

T associated with unobserved particles and spurious values of pmiss T arising from jet energy mismeasurements. No excess of event yields above the expected standard model backgrounds is observed. The results are interpreted in terms of constraints on the parameter space of several simplified models of supersymmetry that assume the pair production of top squarks. The search provides sensitivity to a broad range of top squark (t) decay modes, including the two-body decay t→ c χ01, where c is a charm quark and χ0 1 is the lightest neutralino, as well as the four-body decay t→ b f f χ0 1, where b is a bottom quark and f and f are fermions produced in the decay of an intermediate off-shell W boson. These modes dominate in scenarios in which the top squark and lightest neutralino are nearly degenerate in mass. For these modes, top squarks with masses as large as 260 and 225 GeV are excluded, respectively, for the two-and four-body decays.© 2017 The Author. Published by Elsevier BV This is an open access article under the CC BY license

Authors

V Khachatryan,AM Sirunyan,A Tumasyan,W Adam,E Asilar,T Bergauer,J Brandstetter,E Brondolin,M Dragicevic,J Erö,M Flechl,M Friedl,R Frühwirth,VM Ghete,C Hartl,N Hörmann,J Hrubec,M Jeitler,A König,M Krammer,I Krätschmer,D Liko,T Matsushita,I Mikulec,D Rabady,N Rad,B Rahbaran,H Rohringer,J Schieck,J Strauss,W Treberer-Treberspurg,W Waltenberger,C-E Wulz,N Shumeiko,S Alderweireldt,T Cornelis,EA De Wolf,X Janssen,A Knutsson,J Lauwers,S Luyckx,M Van De Klundert,H Van Haevermaet,P Van Mechelen,A Van Spilbeeck,S Abu Zeid,F Blekman,J D'Hondt,N Daci,I De Bruyn,K Deroover,N Heracleous,J Keaveney,S Lowette,S Moortgat,L Moreels,A Olbrechts,Q Python,D Strom,S Tavernier,W Van Doninck,P Van Mulders,I Van Parijs,H Brun,C Caillol,B Clerbaux,G De Lentdecker,G Fasanella,L Favart,R Goldouzian,A Grebenyuk,G Karapostoli,T Lenzi,A Léonard,T Maerschalk,A Marinov,A Randle-conde,T Seva,C Vander Velde,P Vanlaer,R Yonamine,F Zenoni,F Zhang,L Benucci,A Cimmino,S Crucy,D Dobur,A Fagot,G Garcia,M Gul,J Mccartin,AA Ocampo Rios,D Poyraz,D Ryckbosch,S Salva,R Schöfbeck,M Sigamani,M Tytgat,W Van Driessche,E Yazgan,N Zaganidis,C Beluffi,O Bondu,S Brochet,G Bruno,A Caudron,L Ceard,S De Visscher,C Delaere,M Delcourt,L Forthomme,B Francois,A Giammanco,A Jafari,P Jez,M Komm,V Lemaitre,A Magitteri,A Mertens,M Musich,C Nuttens,K Piotrzkowski,L Quertenmont,M Selvaggi,M Vidal Marono,S Wertz,N Beliy,GH Hammad,WL Aldá Júnior,FL Alves,GA Alves,L Brito,M Correa Martins Junior,M Hamer,C Hensel,A Moraes,ME Pol,P Rebello Teles,E Belchior Batista Das Chagas,W Carvalho,J Chinellato,A Custódio,EM Da Costa,D De Jesus Damiao,C De Oliveira Martins,S Fonseca De Souza,LM Huertas Guativa,H Malbouisson,D Matos Figueiredo,C Mora Herrera

Published Date

2021/9/20

Measurement of the positive muon anomalous magnetic moment to 0.46 ppm

We present a new measurement of the positive muon magnetic anomaly, a μ≡(g μ− 2)/2, from the Fermilab Muon g− 2 Experiment using data collected in 2019 and 2020. We have analyzed more than 4 times the number of positrons from muon decay than in our previous result from 2018 data. The systematic error is reduced by more than a factor of 2 due to better running conditions, a more stable beam, and improved knowledge of the magnetic field weighted by the muon distribution, ω p′, and of the anomalous precession frequency corrected for beam dynamics effects, ω a. From the ratio ω a/ω p′, together with precisely determined external parameters, we determine a μ= 116 592 057 (25)× 10− 11 (0.21 ppm). Combining this result with our previous result from the 2018 data, we obtain a μ (FNAL)= 116 592 055 (24)× 10− 11 (0.20 ppm). The new experimental world average is a μ (exp)= 116 592 059 (22)× 10 …

Authors

DP Aguillard,T Albahri,D Allspach,A Anisenkov,K Badgley,S Baeßler,I Bailey,L Bailey,VA Baranov,E Barlas-Yucel,T Barrett,E Barzi,F Bedeschi,M Berz,M Bhattacharya,HP Binney,P Bloom,J Bono,E Bottalico,T Bowcock,S Braun,M Bressler,G Cantatore,RM Carey,BCK Casey,D Cauz,R Chakraborty,A Chapelain,S Chappa,S Charity,C Chen,M Cheng,R Chislett,Z Chu,TE Chupp,C Claessens,ME Convery,S Corrodi,L Cotrozzi,JD Crnkovic,S Dabagov,PT Debevec,S Di Falco,G Di Sciascio,B Drendel,A Driutti,VN Duginov,M Eads,A Edmonds,J Esquivel,M Farooq,R Fatemi,C Ferrari,M Fertl,AT Fienberg,A Fioretti,D Flay,SB Foster,H Friedsam,NS Froemming,C Gabbanini,I Gaines,MD Galati,S Ganguly,A Garcia,J George,LK Gibbons,A Gioiosa,KL Giovanetti,P Girotti,W Gohn,L Goodenough,T Gorringe,J Grange,S Grant,F Gray,S Haciomeroglu,T Halewood-Leagas,D Hampai,F Han,J Hempstead,DW Hertzog,G Hesketh,E Hess,A Hibbert,Z Hodge,KW Hong,R Hong,T Hu,Y Hu,M Iacovacci,M Incagli,P Kammel,M Kargiantoulakis,M Karuza,J Kaspar,D Kawall,L Kelton,A Keshavarzi,DS Kessler,KS Khaw,Z Khechadoorian,NV Khomutov,B Kiburg,M Kiburg,O Kim,N Kinnaird,E Kraegeloh,VA Krylov,NA Kuchinskiy,KR Labe,J LaBounty,M Lancaster,S Lee,B Li,D Li,L Li,I Logashenko,A Lorente Campos,Z Lu,A Lucà,G Lukicov,A Lusiani,AL Lyon,B MacCoy,R Madrak,K Makino,S Mastroianni,JP Miller,S Miozzi,B Mitra,JP Morgan,WM Morse,J Mott,A Nath,JK Ng,H Nguyen,Y Oksuzian,Z Omarov,R Osofsky,S Park,G Pauletta,GM Piacentino,RN Pilato,KT Pitts,B Plaster,D Počanić,N Pohlman,CC Polly,J Price

Journal

Physical Review Letters

Published Date

2023/10/17

Professor FAQs

What is Nicholas Eggert's h-index at Cornell University?

The h-index of Nicholas Eggert has been 80 since 2020 and 152 in total.

What are Nicholas Eggert's top articles?

What is Nicholas Eggert's total number of citations?

Nicholas Eggert has 124,486 citations in total.

academic-engine

Useful Links